Must read

The Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023
– the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
In the second of three articles for Local Government Lawyer on the Procurement
Act 2023 one year after it went live, Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from
DAC Beachcroft consider some of its practical impact and implications, including
how to choose the right regime, how authorities are tackling the notice requirements,
considerations when making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.
The Practical impact of the Procurement
Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits
and the legal lacunas
Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from DAC Beachcroft
consider some of its practical impact and implications,
including how to choose the right regime, how authorities
are tackling the notice requirements, considerations when
making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.


Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.
Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.


The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.


Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.
Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.

Newsletter registration
Injunctions to restrain breaches of planning control
Who bears the burden?
Lawfulness and applications for a CLEUD
The OIA’s 2026 operating plan: What universities need to know
The Cardiff Airport subsidy control ruling
White Paper on SEN reforms: some lessons from the current Welsh SEN system
Greyhound racing and the separation of powers
CILEX and others v Mazur and others [2026] EWCA Civ 369
The Hillsborough Law Bill: implications for public bodies
Dispensing with notice to father
Court of Protection case update April 2026
The new PD27A: a step change in Family Court bundle and document management
Déjà Vu – the implications of Zenobē Energy’s latest case for local government
The ERA – Benefits and Working Conditions
£150m Clean Maritime Grant Competition Opens – Critical Subsidy Control Steps for Applicants
Failure by Employers to Keep Holiday Records Becomes a Criminal Offence From April 2026
Why I Wanted to Explore Intensity of Review Across the UK and New Zealand
Asylum hotels, overcrowding and the HMO rules
Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
Intentional homelessness and tenancies obtained by false statement
Defective but not fatal
Self-grants of planning permission, functional separation and demolition avoidance
The lawfulness of emailing licensing decision notices
Intervention: the Monitoring Officer’s view
The role of the backbench councillor
FOI and information held on computer systems
Sentencing guidelines for HSE offences and public bodies
Correcting mistakes in public decision making
The Supreme Court on termination of JCT contracts
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Housing delivery stalling - role of local authorities
Renters’ Rights Act 2025 - what it means for local authorities
DOLS and Under 16s: Insights from Medway Council v A Father
The Local Power Plan: Putting Clean Power in Communities’ Hands
The powers of exclusion panels
Removal from kinship care
When school discipline meets disability
Navigating the expansion of foster care
Personal welfare deputies – Lawson and Mottram strikes back?
No "clinical decision" exemption from best interests
Local Government Reorganisation 2026
Adoption vs long-term fostering
Evolution of the academy trust and maintained school landscape
Care leavers and redaction of records
“Unusual facts and procedural irregularities”
Planning appeals and costs awards
Refusal of planning applications against officers’ advice
Land value and the principle of reality
The latest Sizewell C JR
Impecuniosity and other issues in credit hire claims
Anti-Money Laundering: Key Issues for Local Government Legal and Governance Teams
Arts and Culture, Community and Regeneration: The Two New Streamlined Subsidy Routes
Disclosure to the DBS
The CAT and the New Lottery Subsidy Control challenge
Gender-questioning children under draft KCSIE 2026
Accelerating the planning appeals process: unintended consequences
The convergence of DRS, Simpler Recycling and EPR
Reserve below-threshold contracts for UK or local suppliers under the 2026 Order
CMO Principle and Financial Assistance Further Clarified in Latest CAT Judgment on Subsidy Control
Make Europe Build Again – The EU Industrial Accelerator Act
Affordable housing funding news & unlocking S106 units
The Social and Affordable Housing Programme 2026–2036: new guidance
Housing case alert - February 2026
Residential developments: new section 106 delivery roadmap
The Renters Rights Act and social landlords
Assured tenancies: written statements and information sheets
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On - How procurement processes are evolving
Book review: “Reforming lessons”
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
The draft NPPF consultation: what’s new
Mobile phones, AI and schools
Transparency in FII cases
Court documents and AI
Next steps for the LGPS after the access and fairness consultation
What is an Officer?
The High Court on the EHRC’s “interim update”
Substituted decision notices and contempt of court
Social media guidance for members
2026 in construction: a look ahead
Track allocation in housing disrepair claims
Withdrawing applications for care orders
Appropriate professional boundaries for teachers
Children under 16 and deprivation of liberty
A Welsh white leopard?
Conversion to an ‘empty’ MAT
Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
Why AI must power the next wave of Social Housing delivery
Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Sponsored articles
Unlocking legal talent
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Recovery Time
- Details
Jessica Swannell explains how to avoid a common mistake that can cost public bodies dearly in litigation.
During my years of working for both Central and Local Government, there have been numerous occasions where both are losing a substantial amount of money through recovery of legal costs by not simply time recording correctly.
The usual rule is that the unsuccessful party will be liable for the successful party’s legal costs in the proceedings.
There are two types of basis of assessment, Standard or Indemnity Basis which are contained at CPR44.3. The usual rule is that costs are assessed on the Standard Basis unless ordered otherwise.
Standard Basis is where only proportionate costs are allowed and any doubt as to reasonableness of the costs claimed are found in favour of the paying party.
Indemnity Basis is where any doubt as to reasonableness is found in favour of the receiving party. Proportionality does not apply to Indemnity Basis awards.
The Court will not allow costs that are on either basis unreasonably incurred or unreasonable in amount.
If you are recovering your legal costs on the standard basis and there is the slightest bit of doubt in the Judge’s mind upon an assessment in relation to an item then you will either loose the time spent on that item or have the same reduced.
The following are four key steps on how to maximise your legal costs recovery.
1. Time Recording System
There are some very good case management systems on the market which include a programme for time recording however, the same are very expensive. If there is not enough money within the budget for this software, it is very easy to create your own time recording system by simply using Excel and formulas to calculate the amount of time and expenses. The basic columns that you will need are:
- Date
- Reference
- Case Name
- Fee Earner
- Fee Earner’s hourly rate
- Description of work done
- Time spent
- Amount in money each item took to complete
- Expenses Tab
The above are the basic columns you will need but you can add as many as you require and you can also have the system self-calculating in relation to calculating how much each item of work has costed.
2. Attendance notes
Attendance notes are the lifeblood of claims for costs. Costs are the lifeblood of any legal practice. Whilst time recording is important to help maximise recovery, if there is no evidence of the work conducted on file or a detailed attendance note is not completed, how will you be able to prove to the Judge upon assessment that the work was actually done and the same was reasonable?
Therefore time must be spent making proper attendance notes. An entry on a time sheet recorded on a computer without any reference to the file itself, will not achieve this. It is significant to note that under current law and practice, time spent making attendance notes is chargeable as is the case of other preparation. Of course the attendance note must be reasonable and the time taken to prepare it must also be reasonable.
It is also vital to remember throughout the conduct of any matter that it is not just attendances which should be noted on the file. Substantial amounts are lost by failure to record time spent on consideration, perusal, preparation and drafting of documents which often will be the single most time consuming element of the work undertaken on the case.
3. File Management
You must ensure that your file is in chronological order and all correspondence is on the file. If you are recovering your legal costs and your case proceeds to Provisional or Detailed Assessment, you will need to submit your file of papers. If your papers are not in chronological order or there is missing correspondence the Judge will instantly be annoyed by this fact given that he only has a set amount of time to read the papers.
4. Bill of Costs preparation
Unfortunately, I have seen both Central & Local Government try to recover their own legal costs but the Bill is either not CPR compliant or the costs have not been maximised. It really is worth spending time and effort maximising your legal costs recovery and using a qualified Costs Lawyer to help you with this.
Remember, good file management and timed, dated and informative attendance notes are the key to maximising costs recovery
Jessica Swannell is a Costs Lawyer and Practice Manager of A&M Bacon Limited, Legal Costs Specialists.
Lawyer / Senior Lawyer
Trainee Solicitor
Qualified Lawyer
Locums
Poll
22-04-2026 11:00 am
01-07-2026 11:00 am









