Must read

The Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023
– the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
In the second of three articles for Local Government Lawyer on the Procurement
Act 2023 one year after it went live, Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from
DAC Beachcroft consider some of its practical impact and implications, including
how to choose the right regime, how authorities are tackling the notice requirements,
considerations when making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.
The Practical impact of the Procurement
Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits
and the legal lacunas
Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from DAC Beachcroft
consider some of its practical impact and implications,
including how to choose the right regime, how authorities
are tackling the notice requirements, considerations when
making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.


Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.
Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.


The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.


Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.
Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.

Newsletter registration
Injunctions to restrain breaches of planning control
Who bears the burden?
Lawfulness and applications for a CLEUD
The OIA’s 2026 operating plan: What universities need to know
The Cardiff Airport subsidy control ruling
White Paper on SEN reforms: some lessons from the current Welsh SEN system
Greyhound racing and the separation of powers
CILEX and others v Mazur and others [2026] EWCA Civ 369
The Hillsborough Law Bill: implications for public bodies
Dispensing with notice to father
Court of Protection case update April 2026
The new PD27A: a step change in Family Court bundle and document management
Déjà Vu – the implications of Zenobē Energy’s latest case for local government
The ERA – Benefits and Working Conditions
£150m Clean Maritime Grant Competition Opens – Critical Subsidy Control Steps for Applicants
Failure by Employers to Keep Holiday Records Becomes a Criminal Offence From April 2026
Why I Wanted to Explore Intensity of Review Across the UK and New Zealand
Asylum hotels, overcrowding and the HMO rules
Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
Intentional homelessness and tenancies obtained by false statement
Defective but not fatal
Self-grants of planning permission, functional separation and demolition avoidance
The lawfulness of emailing licensing decision notices
Intervention: the Monitoring Officer’s view
The role of the backbench councillor
FOI and information held on computer systems
Sentencing guidelines for HSE offences and public bodies
Correcting mistakes in public decision making
The Supreme Court on termination of JCT contracts
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Housing delivery stalling - role of local authorities
Renters’ Rights Act 2025 - what it means for local authorities
DOLS and Under 16s: Insights from Medway Council v A Father
The Local Power Plan: Putting Clean Power in Communities’ Hands
The powers of exclusion panels
Removal from kinship care
When school discipline meets disability
Navigating the expansion of foster care
Personal welfare deputies – Lawson and Mottram strikes back?
No "clinical decision" exemption from best interests
Local Government Reorganisation 2026
Adoption vs long-term fostering
Evolution of the academy trust and maintained school landscape
Care leavers and redaction of records
“Unusual facts and procedural irregularities”
Planning appeals and costs awards
Refusal of planning applications against officers’ advice
Land value and the principle of reality
The latest Sizewell C JR
Impecuniosity and other issues in credit hire claims
Anti-Money Laundering: Key Issues for Local Government Legal and Governance Teams
Arts and Culture, Community and Regeneration: The Two New Streamlined Subsidy Routes
Disclosure to the DBS
The CAT and the New Lottery Subsidy Control challenge
Gender-questioning children under draft KCSIE 2026
Accelerating the planning appeals process: unintended consequences
The convergence of DRS, Simpler Recycling and EPR
Reserve below-threshold contracts for UK or local suppliers under the 2026 Order
CMO Principle and Financial Assistance Further Clarified in Latest CAT Judgment on Subsidy Control
Make Europe Build Again – The EU Industrial Accelerator Act
Affordable housing funding news & unlocking S106 units
The Social and Affordable Housing Programme 2026–2036: new guidance
Housing case alert - February 2026
Residential developments: new section 106 delivery roadmap
The Renters Rights Act and social landlords
Assured tenancies: written statements and information sheets
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On - How procurement processes are evolving
Book review: “Reforming lessons”
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
The draft NPPF consultation: what’s new
Mobile phones, AI and schools
Transparency in FII cases
Court documents and AI
Next steps for the LGPS after the access and fairness consultation
What is an Officer?
The High Court on the EHRC’s “interim update”
Substituted decision notices and contempt of court
Social media guidance for members
2026 in construction: a look ahead
Track allocation in housing disrepair claims
Withdrawing applications for care orders
Appropriate professional boundaries for teachers
Children under 16 and deprivation of liberty
A Welsh white leopard?
Conversion to an ‘empty’ MAT
Local Government Reorganisation 2026
Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
Why AI must power the next wave of Social Housing delivery
Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Sponsored articles
Unlocking legal talent
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Red faces at Treasury Solicitor’s after data breaches during litigation
- Details
The Treasury Solicitor’s Department has given an undertaking to the Information Commissioner’s Office to improve its practices after an investigation into four breaches of the Data Protection Act.
The self-reported breaches took place between August 2011 and November 2012. Three involved case files being sent to a claimant’s solicitor and then on to the claimant during the course of litigation with un-redacted third party personal data contained within them.
“These incidents resulted in the personal data being disclosed in error to third parties,” the undertaking said.
The fourth breach (also self-reported) involved a bundle of case papers relating to an unfair dismissal claim.
“These were sent to an individual during the process of the claim and contained personal data relating to another individual’s separate claim,” the undertaking revealed. “This incident resulted in third party personal data being disclosed in error.”
During the course of its investigation, the ICO found that:
- Although the Treasury Solicitor’s Department had some appropriate measures in place to safe guard personal data, there were identifiable gaps within those measures which needed addressing in order to achieve greater compliance with the DPA. “For example in each of the three breaches referenced above some but not all third party personal data had been redacted prior to the disclosures being made";
- Staff at the Department had evidently been made aware of their obligations under the Act and had the knowledge and tools to comply with the Act’s requirements “but the data controller [the department] could go further in terms of its processes and training to ensure future compliance.”
Some of the data compromised in the incidents consisted of information relating to the commission or the alleged commission of an offence by the affected data subjects.
The Treasury Solicitor’s Department has now agreed with the ICO that:
- A clear, documented procedure for staff to follow when preparing information for disclosure will be implemented within six months. “This should incorporate a defined checking process with emphasis on the steps to be taken prior to release. The procedure should account for both sensitive personal data and personal data relating to third parties”;
- The communication requirements between junior and senior lawyers carrying out the disclosure process will be defined by a structured, formal procedure with clear lines of communication and implemented within six months. “The responsibilities of staff members should be clearly explained within this procedure”; and
- A mandatory and comprehensive training programme regarding compliance with the Act for all new and existing staff will be put in place within six months. “This should include how training will be presented, tested, refreshed and the frequency of delivery for each.”
ICO Head of Enforcement, Stephen Eckersley, said: “Data security is only as good as the weakest link in the chain. In this case, the Treasury Solicitor’s Department provided guidance to staff on how to prepare documents for disclosure, but there were clear gaps in the information provided and it wasn’t understood by their staff. This led to a series of data breaches over a 16-month period that could easily have been avoided.
“The nature of the work carried out by the Treasury Solicitor’s Department means that they should have recognised that they were failing in their legal duty to keep people’s information secure. However, delays in addressing these issues allowed further breaches to occur, which has resulted in today’s agreement between our office and the department to improve its practices.”
A copy of the undertaking can be viewed here.
A spokesperson for the Treasury Solicitor's Department said: "This is the first time that TSol has been issued with an undertaking. We have reviewed our practices and put in place additional processes to ensure we avoid this type of breach in the future.
"We take this type of breach very seriously, and reported it to the Information Commissioner ourselves. We acted quickly to retrieve the material as soon as the incidents were brought to our attention. We are confident that all material has been recovered and no further dissemination of the material will take place."
Lawyer / Senior Lawyer
Trainee Solicitor
Locums
Poll









