Local Government Lawyer

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1


Newsletter registration

* indicates required
 
 
 
 
 
Practice/Interest Area(s) (tick all that apply)
  •  
Join our other mailing lists (tick to subscribe)

Local Government Lawyer, Info-Gov.uk and Public Law Jobs will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested newsletters and updates. Please tick the box below to authorise us to send the email newsletter(s) and alerts requested above.

 

 

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

A district council has won a High Court appeal after an inspector granted a developer planning permission for 85 dwellings and associated works, in a key ruling on the operation of the National Planning Policy Framework.

In August last year Gladman Developments won permission on appeal for the scheme on land north of Ross Road in Newent.

Forest of Dean District Council, which had in February 2015 refused permission, appealed under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

In its challenge to the inspector’s decision the local authority advanced four grounds of appeal. They were that the inspector:

  1. Failed to consider and give reasons as to whether the site was a 'valued landscape';

  2. Incorrectly applied the NPPF at paragraph 134 and the test on harm to heritage assets;
  3. Failed to consider the interaction between paragraph 134 and paragraph 14 [the presumption in favour of sustainable development] of the NPPF and therefore applying the wrong test;

  4. Gave inadequate reasoning.


The Communities Secretary accepted that Ground 3 had been made out and joined Forest of Dean in asking the judge, Mr Justice Coulson, to quash the decision.

Gladman Developments did not accept Ground 3.

In Forest of Dean District Council v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Anor [2016] EWHC 421 (Admin), Mr Justice Coulson ruled that Forest of Dean’s application on Ground 3 had been successful.

The judge also concluded that it could not be said that, if the inspector had applied the right test, he would necessarily have reached the same answer.

Mr Justice Coulson therefore allowed the application to quash.

Jobs

Poll


 

Past issues

Local Government


Governance (subscribe)


Housing (Subscribe)


Social Care and Education (subscribe)

 


Place (subscribe)

 

Wales (subscribe)

Events

Directory