Must read

The Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023
– the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
In the second of three articles for Local Government Lawyer on the Procurement
Act 2023 one year after it went live, Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from
DAC Beachcroft consider some of its practical impact and implications, including
how to choose the right regime, how authorities are tackling the notice requirements,
considerations when making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.
The Practical impact of the Procurement
Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits
and the legal lacunas
Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from DAC Beachcroft
consider some of its practical impact and implications,
including how to choose the right regime, how authorities
are tackling the notice requirements, considerations when
making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.


Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.
Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.


The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.


Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.
Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.

Must read
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
SPONSORED
AI and Lawtech solutions to the age-old problem of sourcing Counsel at short notice: A Management perspective
Navigating Local Government Reorganisation
Case study: using enforcement powers for the remediation of buildings
How Finders International Supports Council Officers
Ministry of Justice to press ahead with closure of 86 courts and tribunals
- Details
Eighty-six courts and tribunals in England and Wales – representing almost a fifth of the total – are to be closed, the Ministry of Justice has confirmed.
In a written ministerial statement, Shailesh Vara, the Minister for the Courts and Legal Aid, claimed that the court and tribunal estate needed to be updated and many of the buildings were expensive to maintain but unsuitable for modern technology.
Vara added that the courts affected were used for just over a third of their available hearing time.
The Courts Minister insisted that the Government was committed to modernising the way in which in justice was accessed and delivered, with more than £700m to be invested over the next four years.
Vara said: “Court closures are difficult decisions; local communities have strong allegiances to their local courts and I understand their concerns. But changes to the estate are vital if we are to modernise a system which everybody accepts is unwieldy, inefficient, slow, expensive to maintain and unduly bureaucratic.”
The Government’s formal response to a consultation begun in July 2015 means that just five of the courts originally earmarked for closure have won a reprieve.
Sixty-four sites will close as proposed in the original consultation. A further 22 closures are to take place but with changes to the original proposals, the minister said.
More than 2,100 separate responses to the consultation were received, along with 13 petitions containing over 10,000 signatures.
The Law Society, which opposed the closure of 59 of the 91 courts earmarked for closure, expressed disappointment that the Government was pressing ahead with the closures.
President Jonathan Smithers said: “The majority of these closures will make it more difficult for a significant number of people to get to court, disproportionately affecting people living in rural areas, those with disabilities and lower income families.
“Combined with increases in court fees and reductions in eligibility for legal aid, many of the closures will serve to deepen the inequalities in the justice system between those who can and cannot afford to pay.”
The MoJ’s consultation had prompted a strong response from certain local authorities.
Marie Kelly-Stone, Head of Legal Services at Dartford Borough Council, wrote to the Ministry to say there was a “general feeling of dismay” among the various council departments who used Dartford Magistrates’ Court. The Leader of Bridgend County Borough Council meanwhile urged the MoJ to rethink proposals to close its local court, amid concerns over access and the potential for increased costs for the authority’s legal team. Neither court has escaped from closure.
The five courts to be retained are: St Helens County Court; Stockport Magistrates’ Court and County Court; West Cumbria Magistrates’ Court and County Court; Bath Magistrates’ Court, County Court and Family Court; and Carmarthen Civil, Family, Tribunal and Probate Hearing Centre.
Trainee Solicitor
Lawyer / Senior Lawyer
Locums
Poll
22-04-2026 11:00 am
01-07-2026 11:00 am




