Local Government Lawyer


Local Government Lawyer

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1

Newsletter registration

* indicates required
 
 
 
 
 
Practice/Interest Area(s) (tick all that apply)
  •  
Join our other mailing lists (tick to subscribe)

Local Government Lawyer, Info-Gov.uk and Public Law Jobs will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested newsletters and updates. Please tick the box below to authorise us to send the email newsletter(s) and alerts requested above.

 

 

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

The Court of Appeal is this week (3-4 March) hearing an appeal from a local property firm over a High Court ruling that four traffic regulation orders (TROs) made by North Yorkshire Council for Harrogate were valid.

Under the TROs part of the town’s Lower Station Parade would become a bus and cycle lane with the whole road converted to one-way traffic southbound, while there would be other restrictions on traffic movements in adjacent roads.

In August 2025, CMG Ockelton, sitting as a judge of the High Court, dismissed all five grounds argued by local property firm A&E Baines against them.

The applicant had argued amongst other things that the TROs were unlawful due to inadequate consultation, misleading publicity, and flawed decision-making.

However, Judge Ockelton emphasized that the TROs were part of a broader, lawfully adopted transport scheme and that objections to the scheme itself were outside the scope of the challenge. As a result, the application was refused and the TROs remained valid.

A&E Baines appealed.

The appeal is being heard by Lord Justice Lewis, Lord Justice Zacaroli and Lord Justice Dove.

Sponsored articles

LGL Red line

Unlocking legal talent

Jonathan Bourne of Damar Training sets out why in-house council teams and law firms should embrace apprenticeships.

Poll


 

Past issues

Local Government


Governance (subscribe)


Housing (Subscribe)


Social Care and Education (subscribe)

 


Place (subscribe)

 

Wales (subscribe)

Directory

Directory