Local Government Lawyer


Local Government Lawyer

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1

Newsletter registration

* indicates required
 
 
 
 
 
Practice/Interest Area(s) (tick all that apply)
  •  
Join our other mailing lists (tick to subscribe)

Local Government Lawyer, Info-Gov.uk and Public Law Jobs will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested newsletters and updates. Please tick the box below to authorise us to send the email newsletter(s) and alerts requested above.

 

 

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

A Stockport householder has been given a compensation award by the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) in a dispute over the impact of a nearby road improvement on the value of his house.

David Cochrane had claimed that recent local transactions suggest this home had lost £25,000 in value but tribunal chair Diane Martin decided £10,000 was the correct figure.

The case arose after Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council completed the A6 Manchester Airport Relief Road project in 2018.

Mr Cochrane’s property is a five-bedroom semi-detached brick house, constructed in the 1960s, and the tribunal heard the widened road is now 5m closer at a distance of 72m from the rear façade and 50m from the end of the garden.

He said the property suffered a general increase in noise, vibration and traffic fumes from the new layout on the A34, together with more noise from the substantially increased traffic on the A555.

Mrs Martin said she accepted evidence of detriment to the property’s value but said there was “very little basis” on which to alight confidently on what the value would have been had it been sold and the road scheme not built.

She concluded: “On balance, given that the existence of an increase in physical factors is established, I consider that it is likely that this would lead a prospective buyer of the property to obtain a further marginal discount, and that a sum of £10,000 would reflect that discount, being equivalent to 2.3% of £440,000.”

The latter figure was what the tribunal chair arrived at as a likely sale price.

Mrs Martin said: “I accept the claimant's own first-hand evidence that there was an increase in physical factors, particularly noise, at the property as a consequence of the scheme, which is supported by the compensating authority's technical evidence (albeit to a degree which is described technically as slight).

“I award the sum of £10,000 as compensation for depreciation arising from the increase in physical factors.”

Mark Smulian

Sponsored articles

LGL Red line

Unlocking legal talent

Jonathan Bourne of Damar Training sets out why in-house council teams and law firms should embrace apprenticeships.

Poll


 

Past issues

Local Government


Governance (subscribe)


Housing (Subscribe)


Social Care and Education (subscribe)

 


Place (subscribe)

 

Wales (subscribe)

Directory

Directory