Local Government Lawyer


Local Government Lawyer

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1

Newsletter registration

* indicates required
 
 
 
 
 
Practice/Interest Area(s) (tick all that apply)
  •  
Join our other mailing lists (tick to subscribe)

Local Government Lawyer, Info-Gov.uk and Public Law Jobs will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested newsletters and updates. Please tick the box below to authorise us to send the email newsletter(s) and alerts requested above.

 

 

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

The Court of Appeal is today (26 November) hearing an appeal over the High Court’s rejection of a judicial review challenge to the lawfulness of a decision by the Mayor of the Tower of Hamlets to remove a neighbourhood traffic scheme after a public consultation.

Campaign Group Save our Safer Streets (SOSS) lost its judicial review case in December last year after Fordham J rejected all seven grounds brought against the London borough.

Measures to restrict traffic in parts of Bethnal Green were implemented by the borough's former Labour mayor, John Biggs, in 2020.

His successor, Lutfur Rahman, of the local Aspire party, said in his election manifesto that he would remove these.

The dispute is between campaigners who say the low-traffic neighbourhoods have improved road safety and air quality and Rahman, who maintains they have displaced polluting traffic onto busy main roads.

Law firm Leigh Day, which represents SOSS, said that after Rahman's election, two public consultations were conducted which found that more than half of residents surveyed remained in support of LTNs. However, the mayor went ahead with removing the scheme.  

The Court of Appeal granted SOSS permission to appeal on three grounds concerning whether the mayor's consultation process was fair, whether he took the borough's Local Implementation Plan (LIP) into account, and whether he can legally act against the LIP agreed by the council with Transport for London (TfL).

Leigh Day partner Ricardo Gama: “The Aspire party made a manifesto commitment to consult fairly on any changes to LTNs in Tower Hamlets. Our clients are looking forward to arguing in court that, not only have Aspire not stuck to that promise, they have failed to go through the proper process of revising the Local Implementation Plan that the borough agreed with the Mayor of London.” 

Jack Parker of Cornerstone Barristers is appearing for SOSS.

Sponsored articles

LGL Red line

Unlocking legal talent

Jonathan Bourne of Damar Training sets out why in-house council teams and law firms should embrace apprenticeships.

Poll


 

Past issues

Local Government


Governance (subscribe)


Housing (Subscribe)


Social Care and Education (subscribe)

 


Place (subscribe)

 

Wales (subscribe)

Directory

Directory