Local Government Lawyer


Local Government Lawyer

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1

Newsletter registration

* indicates required
 
 
 
 
 
Practice/Interest Area(s) (tick all that apply)
  •  
Join our other mailing lists (tick to subscribe)

Local Government Lawyer, Info-Gov.uk and Public Law Jobs will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested newsletters and updates. Please tick the box below to authorise us to send the email newsletter(s) and alerts requested above.

 

 

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

The High Court will this week (4-5 November) hear a judicial review challenge over the Government’s decision to grant development consent for the expansion of London Luton Airport.

The project would allow for an increase from 19 million passengers per annum (“mppa”) to 32mppa. It would also see the construction of a new passenger terminal and additional aircraft stands.

The Secretary of State for Transport, Heidi Alexander, granted development consent in April this year. Planning inspectors had previously recommended refusal.

The claimant, Luton and District Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise (“LADACAN”), will advance five grounds of challenge before Mrs Justice Lang.

Law firm Leigh Day, which is acting for LADACAN, said these grounds are: 

  • There was an error in law in that greenhouse gas emissions from inbound flights were excluded from the environmental impact assessment (EIA).  
  • There was a lack of consistency in approach between the Luton Airport decision and the process for approving Gatwick Airport’s expansion.
  • There was an error of law in that the likely significant impacts of non-carbon dioxide emissions were excluded from the environmental impact assessment.
  • There was an error of law in concluding that the government’s duty under the Climate Change Act 2008 to adopt policies and procedures to help reach net zero was a ‘pollution control regime’.
  • There was a failure to comply with duties under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000, which require that developments in an area of outstanding national beauty must seek to further the conservation and natural beauty of the area.

Leigh Day partner Ricardo Gama, who represents LADACAN, said: “Our clients are looking forward to a judge having the opportunity to review whether in granting planning permission for a near doubling of passenger capacity at Luton Airport, the Transport Secretary failed to comply with her duties under environmental legislation. While growth may be a political objective, it cannot come at the expense of important environmental checks and balances.” 

Gama has instructed Estelle Dehon KC, Ruchi Parekh, and Hannah Taylor of Cornerstone Barristers to act for LADACAN.

The airport is run by Luton Rising, which is the trading name of London Luton Airport Limited, a company owned by Luton Council.

Sponsored articles

LGL Red line

Unlocking legal talent

Jonathan Bourne of Damar Training sets out why in-house council teams and law firms should embrace apprenticeships.

Poll


 

Past issues

Local Government


Governance (subscribe)


Housing (Subscribe)


Social Care and Education (subscribe)

 


Place (subscribe)

 

Wales (subscribe)

Directory

Directory