Local Government Lawyer

Local Government Lawyer

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1

Newsletter registration

* indicates required
 
 
 
 
 
Practice/Interest Area(s) (tick all that apply)
  •  
Join our other mailing lists (tick to subscribe)

Local Government Lawyer, Info-Gov.uk and Public Law Jobs will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested newsletters and updates. Please tick the box below to authorise us to send the email newsletter(s) and alerts requested above.

 

 

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Lawyers need to be given "clear, practical guidance" on the existing rules around the use of AI, the Law Society has urged in a response to Government plans to introduce a regulatory 'sandbox' for AI products.

Chancery Lane’s statement came as part of its response to a call for evidence launched by the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology on plans to introduce an ‘AI Growth Lab’.

The ‘Growth Lab’ will function as a "cross-economy sandbox that would carefully supervise the deployment of AI-enabled products and services that current regulation hinders", according to the call for evidence.

It could also lift "unnecessary legal barriers" to AI in legal services and the planning system through more dynamic UK regulation, the Government added.

The Law Society said it is looking forward to working with the Department on the programme, but emphasised the importance of maintaining current legal sector regulation when using AI tools, including in reserved legal activities.

"Instead of changing or introducing new regulation, lawyers need to be provided with clear, practical guidance on existing rules," a statement from Chancery Lane added.

It specifically called for more clarity on whether client data must be anonymised when it is being input into AI platforms, guidance on data security, storage and sharing, and guidance on whether lawyers must always oversee AI used in legal services.

It also asked for more guidance on how AI can be used by solicitors to help carry out reserved legal activities like court representation, conveyancing, and probate - and for advice on who is responsible when AI gives incorrect or harmful legal advice.

Law Society CEO Ian Jeffery said: “AI innovation is vital for the legal sector and already has great momentum.

“The existing legal regulatory framework supports progress. The main challenges don’t stem from regulatory burdens, but rather from uncertainty, cost, data and skills associated with AI adoption.

“Technological progress in the legal sector should not expose clients or consumers to unregulated risks. Current regulation of the profession reflects the safeguards that Parliament deemed vital to protect clients and the public. 

“It ensures trust in the English and Welsh legal system worldwide.”

Adam Carey

Past issues

Local Government


Governance (subscribe)


Housing (Subscribe)


Social Care and Education (subscribe)

 


Place (subscribe)

 

Wales (subscribe)

Directory